Prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers $p$ such that there are exactly $p^2$ integer triples $(x,y,z)$ such that $0 \leq x,y,z < p$ and $x^2+y^2 - 2010z^3$ is divisible by $p$.
Solution
We will first show that any prime that has form $p = 6k-1$ and does not divide 2010 satisfies the given condition.
First, let $p$ be such prime. Suppose there are $a,b \in \{ 1, \dots, p-1 \}$ such that $a^3 \equiv b^3 \mod p$.
Since $b^{p-1} \equiv 1 \mod p$ then let $c \equiv ab^{p-2} \mod p$, so that we have $bc \equiv a \mod p$.
Then $b^3c^3 \equiv a^3 \equiv b^3 \mod p$ which means $b^3c^3 \equiv b^3 \mod p$ which then means $c^3 \equiv 1 \mod p$ (since $(b,p) = 1$).
Because $c^{p-1} = c^{6k-2} \equiv 1 \mod p$ and $c^{6k-3} = c^{3(2k-1)} \equiv 1 \mod p$, then we must have $c \equiv 1 \mod p$, which means $a \equiv b \mod p$.
In summary, we've shown that $a^3 \equiv b^3 \Rightarrow a \equiv b \mod p$. This means that the set $\{1^3, \dots, p^3 \} \mod p$ is the same as set $\{ 1, \dots, p \} \mod p$. So given any arbitrary $x$ and $y$, we can find exactly one $z$ such that $z^3 \equiv 2010^{-1} (x^2+y^2) \mod p$. Since there are $p^2$ possible pairs for $(x,y)$, then there are also $p^2$ possible triples for $(x,y,z)$.
Now we show that there are infinitely many primes of the form $6k-1$ which would mean that there must be infinitely many primes of the form $6k-1$ that do not divide 2010.
Note that any prime above 3 must have form $6k+1$ or $6k-1$. If there are only finite number of primes of the form $6k-1$, say $p_1, p_2, \dots, p_n$, consider the number $N = 6p_1p_2 \dots p_n - 1$.
For each $i$, $p_i$ does not divide $N$ because otherwise $p_i$ would also have to divide 1, a contradiction. So $N$ is not divisible by any of the $p_i$s, which means all prime factors of $N$ must be of the form $6k+1$. That means, $N \equiv 1 \mod 6$, a contradiction.
Showing posts with label Solved. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Solved. Show all posts
Monday, August 9, 2010
Friday, July 23, 2010
a,b,c integers and cubic number
Suppose $a,b,c$ are positive integers such that $\frac{a}{b} + \frac{b}{c} + \frac{c}{a}$ is an integer. Prove that $abc$ is a cubic number.
Solution
We have $ab^2 + bc^2 + ca^2 = kabc$ for some k.
Let $d = \gcd(a,b,c)$. We can replace $a,b,c$ by $a/d, b/d, c/d$ respectively and the problem does not change. Thus, without loss of generality, we may assume that $d = 1$.
Let $p$ be a prime that divides $abc$, which means $p$ divides at least one of $a,b,c$. We also know that $p$ cannot divide all three, since $d = 1$.
If $p$ divides exactly one of $a,b,c$, for example $a$, then $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $p$, but not $bc^2$. Impossible. Thus, $p$ must divide exactly two of $a,b,c$.
Suppose $p$ divides $a$ and $b$. Furthermore, let $x$ be the largest integer such that $p^x$ divides $a$. Likewise, let $y$ be the largest integer such that $p^y$ divides $b$.
Since $ab^2, bc^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $b$, then so is $ca^2$. Thus $y \leq 2x$.
Since $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $a$, then so is $bc^2$, Thus $y \geq x$, which means $x \leq y \leq 2x$.
Now, since $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $p^{2x}$, then so is $bc^2$, which means $y \geq 2x$.
Therefore, $y = 2x$, which means that the degree of $p$ in the factorization of $abc$ is $x+y = 3x$.
For each prime $p$ that divides $abc$, it must occur as a cubic number in its prime factorization. Thus $abc$ is a cubic number.
A non-trivial example is $a=1,b=2,c=4$.
Solution
We have $ab^2 + bc^2 + ca^2 = kabc$ for some k.
Let $d = \gcd(a,b,c)$. We can replace $a,b,c$ by $a/d, b/d, c/d$ respectively and the problem does not change. Thus, without loss of generality, we may assume that $d = 1$.
Let $p$ be a prime that divides $abc$, which means $p$ divides at least one of $a,b,c$. We also know that $p$ cannot divide all three, since $d = 1$.
If $p$ divides exactly one of $a,b,c$, for example $a$, then $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $p$, but not $bc^2$. Impossible. Thus, $p$ must divide exactly two of $a,b,c$.
Suppose $p$ divides $a$ and $b$. Furthermore, let $x$ be the largest integer such that $p^x$ divides $a$. Likewise, let $y$ be the largest integer such that $p^y$ divides $b$.
Since $ab^2, bc^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $b$, then so is $ca^2$. Thus $y \leq 2x$.
Since $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $a$, then so is $bc^2$, Thus $y \geq x$, which means $x \leq y \leq 2x$.
Now, since $ab^2, ca^2, kabc$ are all divisible by $p^{2x}$, then so is $bc^2$, which means $y \geq 2x$.
Therefore, $y = 2x$, which means that the degree of $p$ in the factorization of $abc$ is $x+y = 3x$.
For each prime $p$ that divides $abc$, it must occur as a cubic number in its prime factorization. Thus $abc$ is a cubic number.
A non-trivial example is $a=1,b=2,c=4$.
Labels:
cubic number,
factorization,
gcd,
homogeneous,
Number Theory,
prime,
Solution,
Solved
Monday, May 31, 2010
Triangle Inequality
Given a triangle $ABC$ and a point $M$ inside the triangle.
Let $\alpha = \angle BMC, \beta = \angle AMC, \gamma = \angle AMB$
Prove that:
$$\frac{AM}{BM.CM} + \frac{BM}{CM.AM} + \frac{CM}{AM.BM} \geq -2 \left( \frac{\cos \alpha}{AM} + \frac{\cos \beta}{BM} + \frac{\cos \gamma}{CM} \right)$$
Solution In Progress
Let
$a = \frac{AM}{\sin \alpha}, b = \frac{BM}{\sin \beta}, c = \frac{CM}{\sin \gamma}$
Because $M$ is in the interior of the triangle, then $0 < \alpha, \beta, \gamma < \pi$ and thus $0 < \sin \alpha, \sin \beta, \sin \gamma \leq 1$. Thus $a,b,c > 0$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $a \geq b \geq c$.
So we have:
$AM = a \sin \alpha, BM = b \sin \beta, CM = c \sin \gamma$
Substitute it to our inequality, and use the following shorthand:
$C_\alpha = \cos \alpha \sin \beta \sin \gamma$
$C_\beta = \sin \alpha \cos \beta \sin \gamma$
$C_\gamma = \sin \alpha \sin \beta \cos \gamma$
So our inequality becomes
$$ \iff a^2\sin^2 \alpha + b^2 \sin^2 \beta + c^2 \sin^2 \gamma +2 ( bc C_\alpha + ac C_\beta + ab C_\gamma ) \geq 0$$
Note the following identities:
$$C_\beta + C_\gamma = \sin \alpha \cos \beta \sin \gamma + \sin \alpha \sin \beta \cos \gamma = \sin \alpha \sin (\beta + \gamma) = \sin \alpha \sin (2 \pi - (\beta + \gamma)) = - \sin^2 \alpha$$
Similarly,
$$C_\alpha + C_\gamma = - \sin^2 \beta$$
$$C_\alpha + C_\beta = - \sin^2 \gamma$$
So that
$$C_\alpha = (\sin^2 \alpha - \sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \gamma)/2$$
$$C_\beta = (\sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \alpha - \sin^2 \gamma)/2$$
$$C_\gamma = (\sin^2 \gamma - \sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \alpha)/2$$
Substituting back to our inequalities, we have:
$$\iff (a-b)(a-c)\sin^2 \alpha + (b-a)(b-c) \sin^2 \beta + (c-a)(c-b) \sin^2 \gamma \geq 0$$
It's also equivalent to:
$$\iff (a-b)^2 C_\gamma + (a-c)^2 C_\beta + (b-c)^2 C_\alpha \leq 0$$
Let $\alpha = \angle BMC, \beta = \angle AMC, \gamma = \angle AMB$
Prove that:
$$\frac{AM}{BM.CM} + \frac{BM}{CM.AM} + \frac{CM}{AM.BM} \geq -2 \left( \frac{\cos \alpha}{AM} + \frac{\cos \beta}{BM} + \frac{\cos \gamma}{CM} \right)$$
Solution In Progress
Let
$a = \frac{AM}{\sin \alpha}, b = \frac{BM}{\sin \beta}, c = \frac{CM}{\sin \gamma}$
Because $M$ is in the interior of the triangle, then $0 < \alpha, \beta, \gamma < \pi$ and thus $0 < \sin \alpha, \sin \beta, \sin \gamma \leq 1$. Thus $a,b,c > 0$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $a \geq b \geq c$.
So we have:
$AM = a \sin \alpha, BM = b \sin \beta, CM = c \sin \gamma$
Substitute it to our inequality, and use the following shorthand:
$C_\alpha = \cos \alpha \sin \beta \sin \gamma$
$C_\beta = \sin \alpha \cos \beta \sin \gamma$
$C_\gamma = \sin \alpha \sin \beta \cos \gamma$
So our inequality becomes
$$ \iff a^2\sin^2 \alpha + b^2 \sin^2 \beta + c^2 \sin^2 \gamma +2 ( bc C_\alpha + ac C_\beta + ab C_\gamma ) \geq 0$$
Note the following identities:
$$C_\beta + C_\gamma = \sin \alpha \cos \beta \sin \gamma + \sin \alpha \sin \beta \cos \gamma = \sin \alpha \sin (\beta + \gamma) = \sin \alpha \sin (2 \pi - (\beta + \gamma)) = - \sin^2 \alpha$$
Similarly,
$$C_\alpha + C_\gamma = - \sin^2 \beta$$
$$C_\alpha + C_\beta = - \sin^2 \gamma$$
So that
$$C_\alpha = (\sin^2 \alpha - \sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \gamma)/2$$
$$C_\beta = (\sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \alpha - \sin^2 \gamma)/2$$
$$C_\gamma = (\sin^2 \gamma - \sin^2 \beta - \sin^2 \alpha)/2$$
Substituting back to our inequalities, we have:
$$\iff (a-b)(a-c)\sin^2 \alpha + (b-a)(b-c) \sin^2 \beta + (c-a)(c-b) \sin^2 \gamma \geq 0$$
It's also equivalent to:
$$\iff (a-b)^2 C_\gamma + (a-c)^2 C_\beta + (b-c)^2 C_\alpha \leq 0$$
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Happy Saint Math Trick's Day
This problem is inspired by this comic.
Prove that the trick in the comic always works. In other words, if $p$ is a prime number greater than 3, prove that $p^2 + 14 \equiv 3 \mod 12$
Solution: http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/solution-happy-saint-math-tricks-day.html
Prove that the trick in the comic always works. In other words, if $p$ is a prime number greater than 3, prove that $p^2 + 14 \equiv 3 \mod 12$
Solution: http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/solution-happy-saint-math-tricks-day.html
Labels:
comic,
modulo,
Number Theory,
prime,
Solved,
spiked math
Friday, March 12, 2010
Osculating Circle, Ellipse, and Cone
An osculating circle of a point on a curve is defined as a circle that:
1. passes through that point
2. whose slope at that point is the same of the slope of the curve at that point
3. whose radius is the same as the radius of curvature of the curve at that point
In other words, it is a second-degree approximation circle of the curve at that point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osculating_circle
Given a cone whose half-angle is $\theta$, we take a cross section with a plane whose incident angle is $\theta$. That is, the plane is perpendicular to one of the cone rays. Naturally, the cross section forms an ellipse.
If O is the intersection of the main axis of the cone and the cross section, and A is the point on the ellipse's major axis that's closest to O, then prove that a circle with center O and radius OA is an osculating circle to the ellipse at A.
Hint: for people without any knowledge of calculus, the radius of osculating circle at A is $b^2/a$ where $b$ is half the length of minor axis and $a$ is half the length of major axis (standard ellipse notation).
The rest of the problem can be done without using calculus.
Solution:
http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/osculating-circle-ellipse-and-cone.html
Second Solution:
http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/second-solution-osculating-circle.html
1. passes through that point
2. whose slope at that point is the same of the slope of the curve at that point
3. whose radius is the same as the radius of curvature of the curve at that point
In other words, it is a second-degree approximation circle of the curve at that point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osculating_circle
Given a cone whose half-angle is $\theta$, we take a cross section with a plane whose incident angle is $\theta$. That is, the plane is perpendicular to one of the cone rays. Naturally, the cross section forms an ellipse.
If O is the intersection of the main axis of the cone and the cross section, and A is the point on the ellipse's major axis that's closest to O, then prove that a circle with center O and radius OA is an osculating circle to the ellipse at A.
Hint: for people without any knowledge of calculus, the radius of osculating circle at A is $b^2/a$ where $b$ is half the length of minor axis and $a$ is half the length of major axis (standard ellipse notation).
The rest of the problem can be done without using calculus.
Solution:
http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/osculating-circle-ellipse-and-cone.html
Second Solution:
http://dharmath.blogspot.com/2010/03/second-solution-osculating-circle.html
Labels:
3D,
calculus,
cone,
cross section,
ellipse,
Geometry,
osculating circle,
solid geometry,
Solved
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Paired cards
A standard deck of 52 cards is shuffled with uniform probability. A "pair" is defined as two numerically identical cards that are adjacent in the stack. What is the probability that the deck contains no pair?
Challenge: Find the probability that the deck contains exactly $n$ pair for $n=1,2,\cdots,26$.
Challenge: Find the probability that the deck contains exactly $n$ pair for $n=1,2,\cdots,26$.
Labels:
card,
Combinatorics,
pair,
probability,
Random,
Solved
Monday, January 11, 2010
Coupon drawing
Credit for this problem goes to Sander Parawira
A container holds $N$ coupons. You draw successive coupons from the container, observe the coupon drawn, and then replace the coupon. What is the expected number of draws needed until all $N$ coupons have been seen at least once?
Solution here: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2010/01/12/solution-coupon-drawing/
A container holds $N$ coupons. You draw successive coupons from the container, observe the coupon drawn, and then replace the coupon. What is the expected number of draws needed until all $N$ coupons have been seen at least once?
Solution here: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2010/01/12/solution-coupon-drawing/
Labels:
Combinatorics,
drawing,
expected value,
Random,
replacement,
Solved
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Inequality
For positive real number $a,b,c$ prove that
$2\sqrt{ab+bc+ca} \leq \sqrt{3} \sqrt[3]{(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)}$
solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/12/02/solution-inequality/
$2\sqrt{ab+bc+ca} \leq \sqrt{3} \sqrt[3]{(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)}$
solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/12/02/solution-inequality/
Monday, November 30, 2009
Solution: Integer Inequality
Original problem: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/11/27/integer-inequality/
For any positive real number $t$, prove that there are integers $a,b,c,d$ such that
$! a^3b+b^3c+c^3d < tabcd$
For any positive real number $t$, prove that there are integers $a,b,c,d$ such that
$! a^3b+b^3c+c^3d < tabcd$
Labels:
Algebra,
Inequality,
Number Theory,
Solution,
Solved
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Integer Inequality
For any positive real number $t$, prove that there are integers $a,b,c,d$ such that
$! a^3b+b^3c+c^3d < tabcd$
Solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/11/30/solution-integer-inequality/
$! a^3b+b^3c+c^3d < tabcd$
Solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/11/30/solution-integer-inequality/
Labels:
Algebra,
arbitrarily,
Inequality,
infimum,
integer inequality,
Number Theory,
Solved
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
3 Variable Inequality
For $a,b,c > 0$, prove that:
$! (ab(a+b) + bc(b+c) + ca(c+a))^2 \geq 4abc(a+b+c)(a^2+b^2+c^2)$
Solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/11/30/solution-3-variable-inequality/
$! (ab(a+b) + bc(b+c) + ca(c+a))^2 \geq 4abc(a+b+c)(a^2+b^2+c^2)$
Solution: http://dharmath.thehendrata.com/2009/11/30/solution-3-variable-inequality/
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Triangle Inequality
Given $n$ right triangles each with sides $a_i, b_i, c_i$, with $c_i$ being the hypotenuse ($i=1,\cdots, n)$. Let $A = \sum a_i, B = \sum b_i, C= \sum c_i$.
Prove that
$\displaystyle \frac{a_1b_1}{c_1} + \cdots + \frac{a_nb_n}{c_n} \leq \frac{AB}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$
Harder version: prove that
$\displaystyle \frac{a_1b_1}{c_1} + \cdots + \frac{a_nb_n}{c_n} \leq \frac{AB}{C}$
Prove that
$\displaystyle \frac{a_1b_1}{c_1} + \cdots + \frac{a_nb_n}{c_n} \leq \frac{AB}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$
Harder version: prove that
$\displaystyle \frac{a_1b_1}{c_1} + \cdots + \frac{a_nb_n}{c_n} \leq \frac{AB}{C}$
Thursday, November 19, 2009
3 Sequence Inequality
If $a_i, b_i, c_i$ are sequences of positive numbers for $i = 1,2,\cdots,n$, prove the following inequality:
$\sum (a_i+b_i+c_i) \sum \frac{a_ib_i + b_ic_i+ c_ia_i}{a_i+b_i+c_i} \sum \frac{a_ib_ic_i}{a_ib_i + b_ic_i+ c_ia_i} \leq \sum a_i \sum b_i \sum c_i$
where all summations are taken from $i=1$ to $i=n$. When does equality happen?
$\sum (a_i+b_i+c_i) \sum \frac{a_ib_i + b_ic_i+ c_ia_i}{a_i+b_i+c_i} \sum \frac{a_ib_ic_i}{a_ib_i + b_ic_i+ c_ia_i} \leq \sum a_i \sum b_i \sum c_i$
where all summations are taken from $i=1$ to $i=n$. When does equality happen?
Labels:
arithmetic,
array,
backward induction,
cauchy,
harmonic,
holder,
induction,
Inequality,
mean,
minkowski,
power mean,
Solved
Saturday, November 14, 2009
ABC String
How many strings of A's, B's, and C's are there that satisfy the following conditions:
1. There are $n$ A's and $2n$ total of B's and C's.
2. Every two adjacent letters are different.
1. There are $n$ A's and $2n$ total of B's and C's.
2. Every two adjacent letters are different.
Labels:
binomial,
Combinatorics,
enumeration,
generating function,
polynomial,
Solved,
strings
Friday, October 30, 2009
Divide Colored Balls
There are $2n$ balls of each color: red, green, and blue. How many ways are there to divide them into two groups such that each group has $3n$ balls?
It is the same as the coefficient of $3n$ in the expansion $(1+x+x^2+x^3+\cdots+x^{2n})^3$. The proof is left to the readers as an exercise.
Note that $(1+x+\cdots+x^{2n})^3 = \frac{(1-x^{2n+1})^3}{(1-x)^3} = (1 - 3x^{2n+1} + 3x^{4n+2} - x^{6n+3})(1-x)^{-3}$
But $(1-x)^{-3} = (1+3x + 6x^2 + 10x^3 + \cdots + \frac{(k+2)(k+1)}{2}x^k + cdots)$
So the coefficient of $3n$ in that expansion is:
$\frac{(3n+2)(3n+1)}{2} - 3\frac{n(n+1)}{2} = 3n^2 + 3n + 1$
We shall prove that there are $3n^2+3n+1 = (n+1)^3 - n^3$ ways, which has striking geometrical interpretations.
Create an equilateral triangle with altitude $3n$, and mark all the points that has integer distance to all the sides. These points will form a triangular lattice
It is a well-known fact that for any point in an equilateral triangle, the sum of distances to the sides is constant. Since the altitude of the triangle is $3n$, then for any point in that triangular lattice, the sum of distance to the sides is $3n$. Furthermore, the distances are integers. Thus, these points represent the number of ways to choose $3n$ balls from 3 colors.
However, the constraint that we only have $2n$ supply of each color is not yet enforced. We examine the points in the lattice whose distance to any of the sides is greater than $2n$, and we eliminate them. So we are left with a hexagonal lattice of side $n+1$. This is the projection of a half-shell of an $n+1$-cube that has $n$-cube carved out of it.
First Solution
It is the same as the coefficient of $3n$ in the expansion $(1+x+x^2+x^3+\cdots+x^{2n})^3$. The proof is left to the readers as an exercise.
Note that $(1+x+\cdots+x^{2n})^3 = \frac{(1-x^{2n+1})^3}{(1-x)^3} = (1 - 3x^{2n+1} + 3x^{4n+2} - x^{6n+3})(1-x)^{-3}$
But $(1-x)^{-3} = (1+3x + 6x^2 + 10x^3 + \cdots + \frac{(k+2)(k+1)}{2}x^k + cdots)$
So the coefficient of $3n$ in that expansion is:
$\frac{(3n+2)(3n+1)}{2} - 3\frac{n(n+1)}{2} = 3n^2 + 3n + 1$
Second Solution
We shall prove that there are $3n^2+3n+1 = (n+1)^3 - n^3$ ways, which has striking geometrical interpretations.
Create an equilateral triangle with altitude $3n$, and mark all the points that has integer distance to all the sides. These points will form a triangular lattice
It is a well-known fact that for any point in an equilateral triangle, the sum of distances to the sides is constant. Since the altitude of the triangle is $3n$, then for any point in that triangular lattice, the sum of distance to the sides is $3n$. Furthermore, the distances are integers. Thus, these points represent the number of ways to choose $3n$ balls from 3 colors.
However, the constraint that we only have $2n$ supply of each color is not yet enforced. We examine the points in the lattice whose distance to any of the sides is greater than $2n$, and we eliminate them. So we are left with a hexagonal lattice of side $n+1$. This is the projection of a half-shell of an $n+1$-cube that has $n$-cube carved out of it.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Students in a School
There are 3 schools, each of which has $n$ students. Each student knows altogether $n+1$ students from the other two schools. Prove that we can choose 3 students, each from a different school, such that they know each other.
Labels:
acquaintance,
Combinatorics,
extremal principle,
graph theory,
school,
Solved,
student
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Passengers Boarding Airplane, Part Deux
2009 passengers are waiting in a line to board an airplane with 2009 seats. The seats are numbered from 1 to 2009. Each passenger has a boarding pass that has his/her seat number on it. However, these passengers are oblivious to their boarding pass and choose their seats at random, each with a uniform probability from the available empty seats.
What is the probability that everyone's actual seat number and their assigned seat number differ by at most 1? That is, no one sits more than 1 seat away from their assigned seat.
What is the probability that everyone's actual seat number and their assigned seat number differ by at most 1? That is, no one sits more than 1 seat away from their assigned seat.
Friday, October 23, 2009
2 Variable Recursion
This problem is written as an auxiliary lemma for the solution to this problem.
Suppose $f(m,n)$ is a function that is defined for non-negative integers $m,n$ where:
$f(m,n) = 0$ if $m < n$
$f(m,0) = 1 \forall m$
$\displaystyle f(m,n) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} f(k-1,k-1) f(m-k,n-k) + f(m-1,n) \forall m \geq n$
Prove that $f(m,n) = \frac{m-n+1}{m+1} \binom{m+n}{m}$
Suppose $f(m,n)$ is a function that is defined for non-negative integers $m,n$ where:
$f(m,n) = 0$ if $m < n$
$f(m,0) = 1 \forall m$
$\displaystyle f(m,n) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} f(k-1,k-1) f(m-k,n-k) + f(m-1,n) \forall m \geq n$
Prove that $f(m,n) = \frac{m-n+1}{m+1} \binom{m+n}{m}$
Combinatorial Sum Identity
For $m,n > 0$ prove that
$\displaystyle 1 + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \binom{k+n}{k} = \binom{m+n+1}{m}$
Harder version:
$\displaystyle \sum_{k=l}^{m} \binom{k+n}{k} = \binom{m+n+1}{n+1} - \binom{n+l}{n+1}$
$\displaystyle 1 + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \binom{k+n}{k} = \binom{m+n+1}{m}$
Harder version:
$\displaystyle \sum_{k=l}^{m} \binom{k+n}{k} = \binom{m+n+1}{n+1} - \binom{n+l}{n+1}$
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Boys and Girls around the table
$(n+1)$ boys and $n$ girls are seated around a circular table playing a game. One boy started to put a stone on the table, and they subsequently went around the table clockwise. At each child's turn, if that child is a boy, he puts a stone on the table, but if that child is a girl, she takes away one stone from the table. They're finished when everyone has had one turn. If the table ever becomes empty (except before the first boy put his stone), they all lose the game.
Prove that there is a boy such that if he starts, they can complete the round without losing.
Furthermore, prove that there is only one such boy. That is, if any other boy starts, they would lose the game.
Harder version: suppose you now have $m+n$ boys and $n$ girls, with $m$ positive. Prove that there are exactly $m$ boys who could start a non-losing game.
Prove that there is a boy such that if he starts, they can complete the round without losing.
Furthermore, prove that there is only one such boy. That is, if any other boy starts, they would lose the game.
Harder version: suppose you now have $m+n$ boys and $n$ girls, with $m$ positive. Prove that there are exactly $m$ boys who could start a non-losing game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)