Find the smallest real number t such that, given any sequence of integers A_n of integers greater than 1 having length n, there exists a sequence of positive integers B_n of length n such that:
1. \max{B_i} \leq n \max {A_i}
2. B_n differs from A_n in at most \lceil tn \rceil elements.
Solution
Note that for t=1 we can just change every single element to a small number like 2. We can try to do better. Satisfying condition 2 is easy, because for t = 1/2 we can just change every other element to the the LCM of it's neighboring elements, but this would make it failr condition 1. For example, suppose the sequence consists of very large primes, then this strategy would cause every other element to be the product of the two large primes, failing condition 1.
We propose that t = 2/3 satisfies the condition. That is, if A_n = a_1, a_2, a_3,a_4,a_5,a_6,\dots,a_n B_n = 2a_2, a_2, 2a_2, 2a_5, a_5, 2a_5, \dots
We can see that every two neighboring elements are not coprime, and that the maximum of B_i is at most twice that of A_i. We show that there is no smaller t that can satisfy, using a series of counter examples.
For n=3, consider the sequence p_1,p_2,p_3 of very large primes. There is no way to only change one element to be nice, while keeping the maximum element manageable. The only way to change one element to be nice is to change p_2 \to p_1p_3, which then would fail condition 1. So we must change at least 2 elements, which means \lceil 3t \rceil \geq 2, so t > \frac{1}{3}
For n=5 consider the sequence p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,p_5. If we were to change only 2 elements, either we change p_2,p_4, or we leave two neighboring primes intact. But if we change p_2,p_4, this could mean we have to change p_2 to LCM of p_1,p_3 and so on, violating condition 1. So we must change at least 3 elements, which means \lceil 5t \rceil \geq 3 so t \frac{2}{5}
No comments:
Post a Comment