For all i, 0 \leq a_i \leq 2013 and 0 \leq b_i \leq 2013.
For i \neq j, a_i + a_j \neq 2013 and b_i + b_j \neq 2013
a_0 = b_0
There exists a real number S such that for all i, a_i + b_{1008-i} = S.
What are the possible values of S?
Solution
Note that for a_i and b_i, we need to choose 1007 numbers from 2014 numbers (0,1,...,2013) and no two of those chosen ones may add up to 2013. Thus, from each of the following pairs of numbers (0,2013), (1,2012), \dots, (1006,1007) we must choose exactly one number. Thus, at most one of 0 or 2013 may be chosen. For now, let's assume that a_1 = b_1 = 0, which means 2013 is not chosen in both a_i and b_i. We'll deal with the other cases later.Let k be the first number that is not chosen in a_i. That means 0, \dots, k-1 are all chosen, so we have a_1 = 0, a_2 = 1, \dots, a_k = k-1.
This also means that 2013, \dots, 2013-(k-1) are not chosen but 2013-k is chosen. In other words, 2013-k is the largest chosen number in a_i, so a_{1007} = 2013-k. Because b_1 = 0 then S = 2013-k. That means b_{1007}=2013-k - a_0 = 2013-k
Because 2013-k is the largest chosen number in b_i, then 2013-k+1,\dots,2013 are not chosen in b_i, therefore 0,\dots,k-1 are chosen in b_i and k is not chosen in b_i.
Because 0,\dots,k-1 are chosen in b_i, and S = 2013-k, that means 2013-k, 2013-k-1, \dots, 2013-(2k-1) are chosen in a_i, which means k,k+1,\dots,2k-1 are not chosen in a_i. Likewise, because 0,\dots,k-1 are chosen in a_i, and S = 2013-k, that means 2013-k, 2013-k-1, \dots, 2013-(2k-1) are chosen in b_i, which means k,k+1,\dots,2k-1 are not chosen in b_i.
At this point, we have established the following fact:
- The first k numbers in a_i and b_i are chosen, and the next k numbers are not chosen.
- The last k numbers in a_i and b_i are not chosen, and the previous k numbers are chosen.
- 2km, \dots, (2m+1)k-1 are chosen in a_i and b_i.
- (2m+1)k, \dots, (2m+2)k-1 are not chosen in a_i and b_i.
- 2013-((2m+1)k-1), \dots, 2013-2km are not chosen in a_i and b_i.
- 2013-((2m+2)k-1), \dots, 2013-(2m+1)k are chosen in a_i and b_i.
Because (2m+1)k, \dots, (2m+2)k-1 are not chosen in a_i and S = 2013-k then 2013-k-((2m+2)k-1), \dots, 2013-k-(2m+1)k are not chosen in b_i. In other words, 2013-((2m+3)k-1), \dots, 2013-(2m+2)k are not chosen in b_i. Similarly, they're not chosen in a_i as well.
Now because those are not chosen in b_i, then (2m+2)k,\dots,(2m+3k)-1 are chosen in b_i. Similarly, chosen in a_i as well.
Because S=2013-k and (2m+2)k,\dots,(2m+3k)-1 are chosen in b_i then 2013-((2m+4)k-1), \dots, 2013-(2m+3)k are chosen in a_i, and similarly, chosen in b_i as well.
Because the above are chosen, then (2m+3)k, \dots, (2m+4)k-1 are not chosen in a_i, b_i, and this completes the induction step.
So now that our claim is proven, we note that this pattern must continue for all values of m as long as no index becomes negative. There is no restriction of the value of m in our proof of the claim. That means that towards the end of the sequence, our pattern must "line up" with what we know about a_{1007} and b_{1007}, namely, that 2013-k is the largest chosen number in the sequence. This means that the sequence of numbers from 0 to 2013 is divided into an even number of groups, each having k elements. Each group would alternate between all being chosen and all being not chosen. It's easy to check that this configuration matches the conditions above.
From there, we know that 2k | 2014 or k | 1007. Because 1007 = 19 \times 53, then we have four possible values of k.
If k=1, then both sequences look like this: 0,2,4,\dots, 2012. Then S=2012.
If k=19, then both sequences look like this: 0,1,2,\dots,17,18,38,39,\dots,55,56,\dots, 988. Then S=1994.
If k=53, then both sequences look like this: 0,1,2,\dots,51,52,106,107,\dots,158,159,\dots, 988. Then S=1960.
If k=1007, then both sequences look like this: 0,1,2,\dots,1006. Then $S=1006.
Now, we have to address the case where 0 is not chosen in a_i and b_i. We define new sequences c_i = 2013-a_{1008-i} and d_i = 2013-b_{1008-i}. It's easy to see that c_i,d_i satisfy the conditions of the problem, and since 0 is not chosen in a_i,b_i then 2013 must be chosen in them, which means 0 is chosen in both c_i,d_i. This reduces c_i,d_i to the case above, except S is replaced with 4026-S.
Because the possible values for S in the first case is 1007,1960, 1994, 2012 then the possible values for S in this case is 2014,2032,2134,3020.
No comments:
Post a Comment