Solution
If p is a good prime then s \equiv t \equiv 0 \mod p. If p is not a good prime, then s \equiv 0, t \equiv -1 \mod pProof:
Define the "~" (equivalency) as follows: two numbers s \sqrt{2} + t and u\sqrt{2} + v are equivalent if s \equiv u and t \equiv v \mod p. Then we readily see that the following properties are easy to show:
X \sim X (reflexivity).
X \sim Y \iff Y \sim X (symmetry).
If X \sim Y and Y \sim Z then X \sim Z (transitivity).
Given these three then equivalency divides all numbers in te form s\sqrt{2}+t into equivalency classes. Furthermore we see that:
If X \sim Y and W \sim Z then X+W \sim Y+Z and XW \sim YZ. It follows directly from the properties of modular arithmetics.
Now, if p is a good prime, then note that (\sqrt{2} + m)(\sqrt{2} + p-m) = (2-m^2 + pm) + p\sqrt{2} \sim 0. Thus the product of all numbers in question is equivalent to zero.
If p is not a good prime, it's a lot more complicated.
First we claim the following: given X \nsim 0, then there exists Y such that XY \sim 1. We call this Y the inverse of X.
Proof: Given a number a\sqrt{2} + b, first we define the number r as follows: r \in (0, \dots, p-1) such that r(b^2-2a^2) \equiv 1 \mod p.
This r must exist, because b^2 - 2a^2 \not\equiv 0 \mod p, for otherwise we have (ba^{-1})^2 \equiv 2 \mod p, a contradiction.
Then consider the number ar\sqrt{2}-br. The product of this and a\sqrt{2} + b is: (ar\sqrt{2}-br)(a\sqrt{2} + b) = (2a^2-b^2)r \sim 1
Then we prove the second claim: If XY \sim 0 then either X \sim 0 or Y \sim 0.
Proof:
Let X = a\sqrt{2}+b, Y = c\sqrt{2}+d then XY = (bc+ad)\sqrt{2}+(2ac+bd) \sim 0 so we have: bc+ad \equiv 0 \mod p 2ac+bd \equiv 0 \mod p Assuming that both X,Y are not equivalent to zero, either c \neq 0 or d \neq 0 because otherwise Y \sim 0. If d \neq 0 then: abc \equiv -a^2d \mod p 2abc \equiv - b^2d \mod p \Rightarrow b^2d \equiv 2a^2d \mod p (ba^{-1})^2 \equiv 2 \mod p A contradiction. If c \neq 0 then we similarly show: abd \equiv - b^2c \mod p abd \equiv -2a^2c \mod p (ba^{-1})^2 \equiv 2 \mod p Also a contradiction. (The assumption that X \nsim 0 is needed to take inverse of a)
So based on the second claim, we now assert that each number in the problem statement has an inverse, and the inverse is unique. For if XY \sim XZ \sim 1 then X(Y-Z) \sim 0 so Y \sim Z. This means that a lot of pairs among those numbers would multiply 1. The only numbers left are those who are inverses with itself. To find such numbers, note the following:
X^2 = 2ab\sqrt{2} + (2a^2+b^2) \sim 1 \iff ab \equiv 0, 2a^2+b^2 \equiv 1 \mod p If a \equiv 0 then b^2 \equiv 1, so p divides b^2-1 = (b+1)(b-1). The only possible b are 1, p-1, and these numbers are in the problem statement.
If b \equiv 0 then 2a^2 \equiv 1 which means 2 \equiv (a^{-1})^2 \mod p, a contradiction.
So the only numbers who don't "cancel out" with other numbers are 1 and -1, and they're included in the final product. Thus the product of all those numbers is \sim -1.
No comments:
Post a Comment