Solution
The problem does not change if we delete all the zeroes, so we can assume that all numbers are positive. Let a_1 \geq a_2 \geq \cdots \geq a_n be those numbers, and suppose all sums of four are less than 50. So now we have three conditions:
- a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 < 50.
- a_1 + \cdots + a_n \leq 200.
- a_1^2 + \cdots + a_n^2 \geq 2500.
Extend the sequence by adding numbers a_{n+1}, \cdots, a_m where a_{n+1} = a_{n+2} = \cdots = a_{m-1} \geq a_m such that a_1 + \cdots + a_m = 200. This addition will not disrupt condition one and three, so we now have:
- a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 < 50.
- a_1 + \cdots + a_m = 200.
- a_1^2 + \cdots + a_m^2 \geq 2500.
Let us now define a transfer operation as follows. Given a,b with a \geq b, we replace them with a+ \epsilon,b - \epsilon with \epsilon > 0. One can easily verify that a transfer on two numbers will not change their linear sums, but will only increase their sum of squares, because
(a+\epsilon)^2 + (b-\epsilon)^2 > a^2+b^2 \iff \epsilon(a-b)+\epsilon^2 > 0
So now we can apply a series of transfers, beginning with (a_1,a_m), followed by (a_1, a_{m-1}), (a_1, a_{m-2}), ... and so on. In each step, we apply as much transfer as possible, possibly reducing the smaller number to zero in the process. We stop when a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 reach 50, at which points our three conditions become:
- a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 = 50.
- a_1 + \cdots + a_m = 200.
- a_1^2 + \cdots + a_m^2 > 2500.
(Note that the sign for condition 3 changed because equality is no longer possible. In order to reach condition 1, we must do at least one non-trivial transfer and that transfer strictly increase the sum of squares).
Now we apply another series of transfers similar to above. We start with the last numbers and apply the transfer, this time not to a_1 but to a_5. Our goal is such that a_4 = a_5 = \cdots = a_{k-1} \geq a_k > a_{k+1} = \cdots = a_m = 0 for some k. One can achieve this configuration by transferring from the smallest number each time, and raising the largest number that's less than a_4 to be up to par with a_4. After we are done, our sequence looks like this: a, b, c, d, d, \cdots, d, e.
Lastly, we transfer (c-d) from c to a, and (b-d) from b to a to arrive at configuration 50-3d,d,d,d,\cdots,d,e where there are N d's. Our conditions can be rewritten to be:
- (50-3d)+d+d+d = 50. This condition is self-satisfactory and will be removed from our consideration.
- (50-3d) + Nd + e = 200.
- (50-3d)^2 + Nd^2 + e^2 > 2500
But because 50-3d \geq d, then d \leq 12.5, and thus 12d \leq 150. Then
(50-3d)^2 + Nd^2 + e^2 = (50-3d)^2 + e^2 + d(200-e-(50-3d))
= 2500 - 150d + 12d^2 + e^2 - ed
= 2500 + d(12d-150) + e(e-d) \leq 2500
which contradicts condition 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment